The Best Alternative to Encrypt Your Sensitive Data in the Cloud: Boxcryptor vs. Cryptomator
Boxcryptor and the alternative Cryptomator serve the same purpose: to secure your privacy while conveniently storing data in the cloud. What exactly is the difference between them? And which suits your needs better? Find out here.

You want your sensitive data to be secure in the cloud. But so far, no encryption solution has been able to convince you?
Maybe you are looking for a free alternative to Boxcryptor, maybe you are missing relevant features in Boxcryptor, or maybe independence and freedom through free software is important to you.
Whatever it is – you will find answers to your questions here.
In this article, we introduce you to Cryptomator, an alternative to Boxcryptor, and explain the similarities and differences.
We compare the following criteria in this article:
- “Visible” features
- “Invisible” features or security-relevant criteria
A Word in Advance
As you have probably already noticed, this is written by the developers of Cryptomator. Perhaps you are wondering how neutral a comparison with Boxcryptor can be. A fair question.
Our goal is not to convince you that Cryptomator is the best alternative to Boxcryptor the world has ever seen. It is important to us that you can make up your own mind, which is why we will also explain when Boxcryptor is the better alternative for you.
About Cryptomator
We developed Cryptomator because we were not convinced by existing encryption software and wanted an alternative to Boxcryptor.
The crux with other cloud encryption providers was:
- Either they were easy-to-use, but, for example with Boxcryptor, they were so-called “closed-source software” …
- … or they pursued an open-source approach, but did not convince us in terms of user-friendliness.
If you’re wondering what “open source” and “closed source” are all about, don’t worry: We’ll explain what they mean and why closed-source software can be a disadvantage.
(To say it right up front: Closed source does not mean that it is bad per se. But in the context of data encryption, you should not underestimate the issue of transparency – which closed-source software does not offer).
The Big Difference: Cryptomator Is an Open-Source Software and Therefore More Transparent

And this brings us to the big difference between Cryptomator and Boxcryptor: Cryptomator is open-source software, Boxcryptor is closed-sourced software.
With open-source software, many eyes have a scrutinizing look at the heart of the encryption software, i.e. the source code. So they can look to see if the source code actually does what the encryption algorithm says it does. And that is exactly what makes the encryption even more secure.
The security of the algorithm is thus not only checked by official audits, but also by a broad community that quickly uncovers vulnerabilities. The verification of the code is not limited by time or personnel resources or agreements.
Additionally, the code is completely accessible. No chance to have only a part of the code audited for marketing purposes or to hide security vulnerabilities.
So you don’t see the strengths of open-source encryption software at first glance. The advantages lie in security-relevant criteria in the background.
Continue reading here if you want to learn more about data security and open-source software:
Comparison of Boxcryptor and Cryptomator Features
While Cryptomator concentrates on its core task (encryption of cloud storage), Boxcryptor scores points when it comes to integration with other services from Secomba.
General Features
Let’s now compare the visible features. The following table shows you the similarities and differences between the two encryption software solutions:
Cryptomator
![]() | Boxcryptor
![]() | |
---|---|---|
Unlimited number of devices | in Boxcryptor with costs | |
No account needed | Opt-in for local account; default settings store your key on Boxcryptor server | |
Direct file sharing ("integrated sharing") | ||
Restore password without email address ("offline key recovery") Your data is not stored in mails with an email account provider, which further increases security. | ||
Detection of sync conflicts while editing by several people | ||
Support for all common operating systems | Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, iOS | Windows, macOS, Android, iOS no Linux |
Security-Relevant Features
As already described at the beginning, the big difference between Boxcryptor and Cryptomator is invisible, because you do not see the open-source and security-relevant features in everyday life.
Let’s now take a look at these features. For this we compare the features again as a table:
Cryptomator
![]() | Boxcryptor
![]() | |
---|---|---|
File Content Encryption | ||
File Name Encryption | in Boxcryptor with costs and optional | |
File Attribute Encryption | planned | |
Free & Open-Source Software (FOSS) | ||
Directory Obfuscation | ||
Integrity Protection | ||
Quantum-Resistant Cryptography | ||
Audited Cryptography | ||
Memory-Hard KDF | ||
Sharing Without Disclosing Passwords |
Conclusion: When Boxcryptor or Cryptomator Is the Right Alternative for You
Now you know the differences between Boxcryptor and its alternative Cryptomator. Draw your own conclusions:
Check whether the advantages of open-source software and thus the security-relevant criteria are important to you. If you like the approach of Cryptomator, it could be the more suitable alternative for you.
Perhaps the features provided by Boxcryptor are sufficient for you? Then you can decide according to your personal preference.